Good Reviews: The Bubbles in the Champagne
Since publishing The Wandering King in April of 2013, approximately 2,000 copies have been distributed through various booksellers.
Ninety-seven percent of the sales have been e-books rather than hard copies, and 99% have been through Amazon. A distant second is Barnes & Noble (20 sales), and behind them is Apple iBookstore (2 sales). Dead last is Smashwords (1 sale).
The success The Wandering King has received on Amazon has been largely due to the reviews. The average rating of your combined reviews gives your book a ranking under the ‘top rated’ listing and a special spot on Amazon’s web page. This ranking has placed my book in the #1 to #3 spot under the Ancient Greek History category for the last 9 months.
To date, the book has received 40 reviews on Amazon. Here is a breakdown of the number of 5-star through 1-star reviews:
(28) 5 stars
(9) 4 stars
(2) 3 stars
(1) 1 star
It has been a delight to read reviews such as:
- Turning the last page of a good book, ending a good read, is like saying goodbye to a dear friend. One relishes the experience of both and longs for more time together…
- Many thanks to the guy who wrote this book. Really enjoyed it and have recommended it to all my friends. The book is something special, great character development; this man can really write.
- Well-crafted historical fiction both educates and entertains the reader. Stephen Marte’s ‘The Wandering King’ achieves those goals. I’m looking forward to reading more of his story…
- Fantastic story, absolutely loved this. It is the story of a young Spartan growing from boyhood to manhood. The author portrays a character raised in a harsh world, but who still dares to defy tradition and what is expected of him. Brilliant, I cannot wait for the sequel…
A heart-felt thank you to everyone who has taken the time to write a review. You have greatly contributed to the success of The Wandering King.
I do not know Dianne, Steve, Greg or Tomas, or the vast majority of my reviewers, which makes reading their reviews immensely gratifying. Knowing people you’ve never met in Pittsburgh, Dallas or Portland enjoyed the story so much they can’t wait to read more, is music to any writer’s ears.
Admittedly, I do know four of my reviewers. My mom, my brother and two friends have reviewed The Wandering King, but they all read the book and enjoyed it, so their reviews are legitimate. Knowing Amazon will delete your book and toss you off their site if you try planting fake reviews, is all the motivation any author should need to play it honest.
I wish I could get more of my family, friends and co-workers to post reviews. When someone tells me they’ve read the book and loved it, my stock response is: “Put it in writing. Post a review.” Unfortunately, the majority of people who have told me they’ve read the book, never post anything.
Bad Reviews: The Worm in the Apple
The Wandering King has received only one bad review. After a year of nothing but good reviews, I received this in May 2014:
- This is one I put down early. I’ve read Herodotus a number of times and have wondered what Doreius [sic] and His [sic] adventures to the lotus eaters could have looked like. The author tells his story rather than shows. The writing lacks even basic description. I do not have any idea where the other reviewers gave this book even a score higher than 2. It’s that briutal [sic].
If Sparta Fan had an axe to grind with me, he succeeded. His 1-star review succeeded in knocking The Wandering King off its perch as the #1 top-rated Ancient Greek History book on Amazon. Seems hard to believe one review could knock me out of the top seat, but it did, which has adversely affected book sales.
As a professional writer who has spent a lifetime researching The Wandering King and three years writing and polishing his work, it is distressing to read, “the author tells his story rather than shows” and “the writing lacks even basic description.”
I refer Sparta Fan to the first chapter of the book, which appears here in my blog, The Planistai. To quote a sample of showing versus telling:
- While we waited, I noticed Gorgo was trembling beside me. “Are you all right?”
She looked at me wide-eyed. “I am so excited!”
If I wanted to tell the reader how Gorgo was feeling, all I had to do was say, “Gorgo was excited.” Instead, these two lines show her trembling and wide-eyed.
Also in the same chapter appears:
- “No girl is going to tell me what to do,” my cousin Pausanias snorted. Especially not the daughter of Cleomenes. Pausanias was a husky boy, with a thick neck, gloomy, deep-set dark eyes, a face full of pimples and a broad, pug nose that had always made me think of him as a wart hog.
If I wanted to tell the reader Pausanias did not like Gorgo, all I had to say was, “Pausanias did not like Gorgo.” Instead you see how Pausanias feels through his dialogue. Also in the paragraph is a brief description of Pausanias’ appearance. Why Sparta Fan would state the book “lacks even basic description” makes me wonder if he even read it.
Rather than continue to quote additional excerpts from The Wandering King, if you want to make up your own mind on the matter, please read the sample chapter on this site: The Planistai. It’s free.
I apologize if I sound defensive. I am. Writing is an intensely personal experience. Your books are like your children. Insult my son and like any good parent, my reaction is to leap to his defense.
A friend who read Sparta Fan’s review called it a ‘hatchet job.’ In looking over the other books Sparta Fan’s has reviewed on Amazon, I see he’s highly rated a number of books by British author David Gemmell. I’ve tried to read Gemmell’s work, but I don’t care for his style. I would describe his writing as, ‘historical fantasy,’ which doesn’t interest me. To be fair to Sparta Fan, I am guessing he was expecting historical fantasy like Gemmell’s work and instead got historical fiction.
In the end, what I’ve learned from reading Sparta Fan’s review is that everyone has different preferences, and you can’t expect to please everyone. It’s like looking at a painting by Picasso. One person sees an odd collection of blocks and colors that remind them of fingerpainting, while another person sees a woman weeping that is so evocative the viewer is moved to tears.
I suppose all I can do is be thankful that the majority of my readers appear to enjoy my writing. On the flip side, I’ve learned that reading negative reviews can destroy your motivation. Who wants to spend all of the time and energy required to write a book if some stranger with an axe to grind is going to piss all over your work?
Mediocre Reviews: The Flavorless, Chewy Steak
The Wandering King has only received two 3-star reviews. In one, the reviewer had nothing but good things to say about the book.
- The Wandering King is an entertaining read that paints a different picture of the principal families of Sparta than other books of the same genre. Interesting stories, good detail, and enough action to keep the pages turning.
David appears to have enjoyed the story. Why he gave it an average rating is a mystery. Perhaps to him a 3-star rating means it met his expectations or maybe some people are just tough reviewers.
The only other 3-star review commented that the book was “entertaining” but he found it troublesome that I used some modern language that he did not feel was appropriate to ancient Greece. Wish he had given some examples. If he had, I would have corrected them.
* * * * *
Where initially I loved seeing a new book review appear, I am now a lot more tentative about reading them. It’s tempting not to look them at all lest it sap my energy to keep writing. That said, I have no intentions of quitting. Yes, I write so others will read what I’ve written, but first and foremost, I write to create something I would enjoy reading, and that feeling is not likely to go away.
If others have had similar experiences or advice regarding book reviews, would be curious to hear them.